I am a MASTER OF THE ARTS, a MASTER OF THE ARTS in WRITING
POPULAR FICTION no less. I have the
signed document behind a Plexiglas shield to prove it.
But I am no master.
Sure, I’ve been published and recognized and have had put
together a few stories over the years that while not technically dazzling, hold
their own in my humble opinion.
But I am no master.
Those same stories that once seemed to glimmer as if gold,
now only shine enough for me to see a spark of . . . of anything in them. Some
might say it takes a master to recognize and make such an honest statement.
But I am no master.
I am an apprentice, a novice at best--and even that is often
debated in the cavernous hollow where my words, ideas, stories are generated
between thick bone walls. I am not a novelist, and have so few stories written
that I am haunted by one thought, one idea that has taken root in the folds in my
mind, a dark, little nugget that is both so absurd and so precise. The lonely, gnarled bonsai tree, clinging to
my brain, sapping all that feel I know of myself--nourishing itself with my essence,
all that makes me, me. And as it flourishes,
I wither and wonder if I can be called a writer at all. I could on my best days be called a
storyteller--barely--a MASTER OF THE ARTS.
But I am no master.
I have talent. I do
not know if it is inborn, if it was bred into my blood. I have a
talent. Perhaps it resulted from my
education, my knowledge of literary terms, and by the luck being associated
with many, many great writers.
But I am no master.
I know that I am using repetition, alliteration, word
choice, symbolism, cadence, tone to create a mood--a mood that reveals my style
as a writer (scratch that), a writing novice, and these tools serve me well in
this trade.
But I am no master.
The masters are the ones who have sacrificed so much for
what on the surface seems to be so little.
They are the ones who have given up time, friendships, and other
pursuits for Understanding. The ones who
write from the heart, who make it look so easy that I am often ashamed to
compare even a sentence of mine to theirs.
The masters are the ones who humble me, who remind me how
arrogant and clumsily I brandish my craft. It is with the same ridiculousness
that a child wielding a broomstick imagines is a level skilled swordsmanship,
one that would allow him to slay the dragon and save the kingdom.
The masters are the ones whose face I spit in whenever I
can’t be serious enough to sit down to write any amount of words on a regular
basis or whenever I carelessly craft and pass-off a story well before it’s done,
before its been revised or rewritten--what’s that “rewritten”--before
it’s even taught me anything about the world around me or the world within
myself.
I am no master.
But I’m trying.
Who are you trying to convince - yourself? What is the point of it? If you are not a master be at least a good apprentice.
ReplyDeleteThat made me smile. I'm a Master of the Arts as well. Unfortunately mine relates to law, which is what brings bread to the table at the moment.I'm a neophyte in the writing world. If your definition of master is correct then it is a relative one. As my mother used to say. There will always be some beneath you but always far more above you. So, as one of those beneath you, I bow to the master. But, be careful, don't sit on your laurels as I plan to climb the beanstalk.
ReplyDelete